This week, Dahlia and Amy get into the recent campus conflict when white students with hurt feelings thought it’d be a good idea to burn books written by a visiting author. Jennine Capó Crucet was invited to Georgia Southern University to speak about her novel, which was required reading for some freshmen students at the school. Students confronted her during the Q&A and burned her novel after Capó Crucet’s lecture! Plus, we celebrate Indigenous People’s Day and what it means to decolonize a federal holiday.
Doubt starring Meryl Streep, Philip Seymour Hoffman, Amy Adams, and the incomparable Viola Davis was released in 2008 and worth a re-watch in this #MeToo moment.
In Molly Fox’s Birthday by Deirdre Madden, an unnamed narrator spends the day in her friend’s home. Molly is an actress visiting London, and the narrator, a playwright inhabiting Molly’s Irish cottage on her birthday, reflects on their friendship and the crafts of writing and acting.
“Aute Couture” by Rosalía
Members of The Rage get exclusive content, including Bitch magazine in print. Membership starts at just $5 a month and helps support Bitch’s critical feminist analysis.
Subscribe to Bitch’s podcasts on iTunes, Soundcloud, or the Stitcher mobile app.
Subscribe to Bitch’s podcasts through our audio RSS feed.
DAHLIA BALCAZAR: Our shows are produced by Bitch Media, a nonprofit, independent feminist media organization that is entirely funded by our community. If you love waking up to new episodes of Backtalk and Popaganda, join hundreds of fellow listeners as a member of The Rage. As a member, your monthly donation includes a subscription to Bitch magazine in print and digital, a special rage-inspired mug you’ll never wanna put down, exclusive access to a members’ only texting group, and loads of other snazzy benefits. So, don’t wait. Become a member today at BitchMedia.org/rage.
AMY LAM: Hi! Welcome to Backtalk, the feminist response to pop culture podcast. I’m Amy Lam.
DAHLIA: I’m Dahlia Balcazar.
AMY: And each episode, we start off by talking about our favorite pop culture moment. What’s yours, Dahlia?
DAHLIA: Amy, remember that song “Blurred Lines” that was everywhere in, I guess, 2013? It’s like not only was it everywhere. Remember, the whole terrible lyrics are, “you know you want it” in that horrible, low voice?
AMY: Yes! Sadly, how could I forget?
How could any of us forget “Blurred Lines”? So, who even—
Time flies. That was six years ago. And Pharrell is being interviewed in GQ
this month. And he has finally accepted that the song was incredibly rapey. And I didn’
t want to, in his words, and I didn’
t want to—
As I was thinking about this moment, I didn’
t wanna make it too much of a giving Pharrell a cookie because it’
s not, I mean, it is, I mean, the lyric, you know, we remember that the lyrics were very, as Pharrell says, “rapey.” But more like I think it’
s really interesting how he really describes his thought process evolving. So, listen to this.
So, Pharrell says, “I didn’t get it at first because they were older white women who, when that song came on, they would behave in some of the most surprising ways ever. And I would be like, wow. They would have me blushing.”
DAHLIA: “So, when there started to be an”— I know! “So, when there started to be an issue with it lyrically, I was like, what are you talking about? There are women who really like the song and connect to the energy that just gets you up. And ’I know you want it,’ women sing those kinds of lyrics all the time. So, it’s like, what’s rapey about that?”
DAHLIA: [Laughs.] But then he goes on to say, “I realize that there are men who use that same language when taking advantage of a woman, and it doesn’t matter that that’s not my behavior. My mind opened up to what was actually being said in the song and how it could make someone feel, even though it wasn’t the majority.” Which I actually do think it was the majority, but. “Even though it wasn’t the majority, it didn’t matter. I cared what they were feeling too. I realized that we live in a chauvinist culture, and our country hadn’t realized that. Didn’t realize that some of my songs catered to that.” So, that blew my mind.
And like I said, I don’t wanna be too much like, congratulations, Pharrell. You figured out that we live in a sexist, misogynist culture. But I think it’s interesting that he’s willing or interested to say, to talk about this change in his thought process six years later and to be pretty honest to say, like, I really didn’t realize this before, but now I see what everyone was talking about.
Well, better late than never, I guess. [Laughs
.] And it’
s so remarkable how, in his little brain, he was unable to understand context matters and how like, oh, women have been singing these types of lines forever. How come it’
s so bizarre that a man would say the same things, and it would have different meanings? I ughhh! [Laughs
.] I don’
t know what else to say, but yikes. But then it also made me think about how also around, I think it was like the early 2000s when the Beastie Boys
came out to be very woke and to apologize for their very misogynistic and fucked up lyrics in their songs.
AMY: And then they turned out to be like serious activists on really important issues.
DAHLIA: I think the reason why this moment sort of struck me is that I’m so used to treating pop culture moments as sort of it happens, and then it’s over sort of, you know. Maybe something controversial happens, and a artist either does or doesn’t apologize for it. And then the culture moves on. And I definitely feel as if people have, the culture has moved on from this song. And I guess what I thought was really interesting was that pop culture moments keep evolving. And Pharrell obviously has been sitting on this, on his thoughts about this song for six years. And I guess better late than never. But also, I just think it’s an interesting example of how artists and culture makers can change their minds about things and then be willing to sort of condemn—not that he exactly condemned his past work—but definitely said he understood why it was rapey, as he said.
So, what’s your pop culture moment this week, Amy?
AMY: My pop culture moment this week is that in many places in the U.S., people were celebrating Indigenous Peoples’ Day, a.k.a. a Columbus Day. I’m so heartened to see this turn in American culture where we’re starting to recognize how amazingly fucked up Columbus Day is and celebrating Christopher Columbus as the quote-unquote supposed founder of this land that we now call the United States of America. I just remember being a teenager. I think I was like a sophomore in junior high school, and I bought some mail order shirt through like a little paper catalog and everything. It was like punk rock shirt company. I got a shirt where it was talking about how Columbus Day was basically celebrating the day of the genocide of native people in the U.S. And I just remember feeling like [laughing] such a little badass kid wearing it to school!
AMY: But I mean, I just remember feeling kind of betrayed by the U.S. school system by not teaching us the truth of the quote-unquote, “founding of this country” and teaching us this very fucked up colonial history. And I just wanted to say that it means something that the holidays being not only like decolonized, but that there’s education behind it and understanding that we will not celebrate this murderous man and his crew of rapey bros who came onto the shores of this country to colonize it, essentially.
And also, while I was reading about the Indigenous Peoples’
Day, I learned that in 1994, the U.N. had actually declared an International Day of World’s Indigenous People
. And it’
s supposed to be on August 9th. And I was just seeing the list of cities and some states. There are actually three or a handful of states in the U.S. that do not celebrate Columbus Day at all and have completely replaced it with Indigenous Peoples’
Day. So, shout out to those states.
And I just think that this just is an amazing way to sort of reframe how we understand how this country was founded and to also understand that holidays are malleable and not serious, concrete things. And that we need to think about why we celebrate certain things and what they actually mean symbolically and that they could be changed and reclaimed and decolonized. And that’s such a, I think, an important thing to know about our own culture.
DAHLIA: Yeah, I’m still trying to make sense of my “Blurred Lines” pop culture moment. And so, I feel like it’s sort of the same thing. [Chuckles.] Oh, my God. Like this idea, I think I’m very used to thinking of pop culture as not malleable, looking retrospectively.
DAHLIA: I don’t know. I’m still trying to wrap my own mind around it and why it feels so surprising to me when culture does turn out to be malleable in a forward-thinking way, like this example of like mainstream acceptance and implementation of Indigenous Peoples’ Day. And to think that there are kids here where I live in Massachusetts, it seems to be officially Indigenous Peoples’ Day. And I think that the kids that grow up around where I live are learning that it’s Indigenous Peoples’ Day from their youth. It’s just really interesting to think about. I mean, I guess if anything seemed to me as a young person not malleable, it was federal holidays—
DAHLIA: —that are always, always, always the same, you know?
AMY: Yeah, I think you’re bringing such a great point about how there are literal little kids now being raised on the fact that it is Indigenous Peoples’ Day and not Columbus Day, because that can shift your entire thinking about where you live, where you’re growing up, the land that you’re occupying, essentially, and who it once really belonged to, who was forced off of it in order to build the buildings that we go to school in now. And to think how much more radical could we possibly have been if we grew up thinking that, if we grew up being taught that?
AMY: I think that’s so incredible. And I think it is actually, really does connect to your pop culture moment, you know?
DAHLIA: Oh good. I’m glad! [Laughs.]
AMY: I think that you saying that makes so much sense, because when you were mentioning the Pharrell piece, it reminded me that it’s because he’s on the cover of GQ for the quote “new masculinity” issue. So, he’s reflecting on his career, and what does his projection of masculinity mean. And that like, congrats to him, but that people can change and evolve and have new ways of thinking. And that they could have a turn. And I think that’s really heartening for culture in general, because often on this podcast, we’re griping and [laughing] being really upset about how these decades- and centuries-long cultural thinking is so deeply ingrained in us and how harmful it is. And to see that these big institutions like federal holidays or Pharrell Williams—
AMY: —could possibly change and evolve in their thinking. I don’t know. I think it makes and justifies the shit that we talk about here. Like, yes, we can push back on these ideas, and that someday can change serious institutions. And I think that just a small federal holiday like Columbus Day, a.k.a. Indigenous Peoples’ Day is a showing of like how these small, incremental things can mean something and then help literal children reframe their thinking about culture. That’s amazing!
[cutesy bells ring]
re used to hearing and reading about the intolerance that supposedly goes on, on college campuses. We talk about that on Backtalk
all the time. Libertarian and conservative pundits are always eager to talk about how provocateur speakers like Milo Yiannopoulos
or Ann Coulter are being disinvited or so-called no platformed from college campuses and how that proves that college students are all delicate snowflakes who can’
t handle hearing divisive opinions. [Chuckles
.] But last week at Georgia Southern University, students harassed an author and later burned her book on campus, all because they said that the novel, which is about a Latina student, makes uncomfortable generalizations about white people. So, I thought this was a really interesting way to look at the kind of things that are actually happening on college campuses that Fox News doesn’
t talk about.
So, last week, Latina author Jennine Capó Crucet
s an associate professor at the University of Nebraska, she spoke at Georgia Southern University, where her novel, Make Your Home Among Strangers
was used as required reading for some freshman year elective classes. So, some groups of students, some groups of freshmen, on that campus had been required to read her book. The book follows a Hispanic girl who is inspired by herself, who’
s accepted into a prestigious university and struggles in her new, predominantly white life. At the Q and A after the reading, a student asked, and this is a quote, “I noticed that you made a lot of generalizations about the majority of white people being privileged. What makes you believe that it’
s okay to come to a college campus like this”—
DAHLIA: —“when we’re supposed to be promoting diversity on this campus, which is what we’re taught? I don’t understand what the purpose of this was.” So, Crucet replied, “I came here because I was invited, and I talked about white privilege because it’s a real thing that you’re actually benefiting from right now in even asking this question. What’s so heartbreaking for me and what’s so difficult in this moment right now is to literally have to read a talk about this exact moment happening, and it’s happening again. That’s why a different experience, the white experience, is centered in this talk.”
Later that night, videos and photographs appeared online depicting students burning the novel on campus, and Crucet was moved to another hotel for her safety because later, crowds had formed outside of her originally-scheduled lodging. She was also scheduled to speak at another event at Georgia Southern University, but the event was, and this is, quote, “canceled because the administration”— Oh, this is a quote from Crucet. “The event was canceled because the administration said they could not guarantee my safety or the safety of its students on campus because of open carry laws.”
DAHLIA: So, actually the school told her, we are afraid that students might bring guns in response to your presence on campus. And the school actually responded. They said, “While it’s within the students’ First Amendment rights, book burning does not align with Georgia Southern’s values, nor does it encourage the civil discourse and debate of ideas. This is a real example of intolerance on campus, one in which students have endangered the safety of a speaker they’d rather not hear from.” We hear from pundits who like to criticize college students, saying that college is a time to encounter ideas different from our own and engage with them. But I think this example really clearly shows that there’s a difference between students who feel like a speaker’s voice is harmful and dangerous to the people on their campus and students who wanna make a speaker feel harm and endangered on campus.
I think it’
s really rich that the school sent a statement saying that the actions of these students do not reflect the values of the school, because obviously, they do. There are a group—
t know how big they are—
but there are a group of students who thought it was appropriate to burn the book of the author who was coming to speak. I mean, did none of them read Ray Bradbury’
s Fahrenheit 451
AMY: I thought it was required reading across all schools in this great nation. And to harken back to Bradbury’s novel, it is literally a book about the suppression of all types of liberties and freedom by this firm that goes out to burn books because they wanted to stifle ideas and stifle knowledge. And here are these students who are doing just that. And I think that what’s most ironic about this is that the burning of Jennine’s book is because these students felt slighted by her calling out white people and white culture, essentially. And that the reason that they’re allowed, that their sort of First Amendment rights to burn her book are supported by her writing in a way. That because she’s able to tell these stories, in a way, they’re able to sort of enact this type of speech.
But I think that it’
s intellectually dishonest to say that this type of speech is on the same level of like when students protest speakers like my Milo Yiannopoulos, because when people like Milo Yiannopoulos show up at campuses to talk, they’
re espousing these feelings and rhetoric of very harmful ideologies of sort of a dominant culture of white supremacy. Whereas when Jennine Capó Crucet shows up on a campus, she’
s talking about her singular experience of having, not even her experiences; it’
s based on a novel. This isn’
t even based on her book of essays called My Time Among the Whites: Notes from an Unfinished Education
, which is actually so telling that she wrote a very timely book about her previous experience, which sort of like foretold this experience on this campus.
s about, it’
s a novel, you know, where it’
s like a fictionalized thing where she talks about white folks. But it’
s like she’
s in a position where she doesn’
t carry institutional power in the way that, or represents institutional power in a way that, a Milo Yiannopoulos would or does. So, it’
s just so telling that these students are unable to sort of see the meta irony of their actions and how they look completely prove her point. Like Viet Thanh Nguyen
, the Pulitzer Prize-winning novelist, actually tweeted about this. And he says, “Some enraged white people burning a book by a woman of color who criticizes white privilege proves her point,” which is so true!
They showed up thinking that they’re completely powerless, a how dare she come on their campus and generalize white people. When in fact, like we talked about earlier in this very episode, when in fact, we have been raised in this country with generalizations about nonwhite people our entire lives and our entire education, where we read about nonwhite folks and their practices and how they are. We learn about them in such a stereotypical way so that we can make dehumanize them and not care if nonwhite people are marginalized or there are policies against them that tear their families apart, that deport them or harm them in so many real and tangible ways. It’s just so disingenuous for white students to go to her talk and feel like they’re victimized by her novel.
And the thing is that I think that a lot of people probably didn’t even know about her novel. She doesn’t, until this happened, she doesn’t wield sort of this inexplicable amount of power over these white students. It was just like their little white feelings got hurt, and they didn’t know what else to do but to burn her book. And then in the act of burning her book, sort of showed and threatened real violence against her to the point where she had to be rehoused. That’s ridiculous!
DAHLIA: I think it’s also really telling how the school rhetorically puts the rights of the students before they talk about the safety of a visitor to the campus when they say, “While it’s within the students First Amendment rights, book burning does not align with Georgia Southern’s values.” What if they just said, “Book burning does not align with Georgia Southern values?” They first have to acknowledge or say, like, oh, but we understand why you would do this, students. Instead of just saying flatly, this kind of behavior is not acceptable on this campus, they’re saying like, well, it’s not acceptable, but legally it’s acceptable, and you legally can totally do this.
And I was reading another statement that was released by somebody who is a senior in professional communications, gender studies, a student. Her name is Nora Cook
. She says that, “I think it’
s exemplary of the culture that’
s being fostered on the Statesboro campus. It’
s a culture that puts white people and white feelings above the safety of marginalized communities.” And I think that’
s such an appropriate quote, because it’
s talking about putting white feelings above the actual physical safety of a marginalized person. And in this case, it’
s a Latinx woman. And I…. [Laughs
AMY: I’m even speechless because I think it just speaks to so much about sort of white supremacist rhetoric, where especially the type of white supremacist rhetoric that people on the far right or people like Trump speak to where they sort of like foment this fear of nonwhite people like poking at them or poking white folks and making them feel too small or making them feel as if they’re in danger. And I mean, I haven’t read Capó Crucet’s novel, but I wonder if they’re sort of like getting a taste, however, morphed it is where in their brains where they’re reading about generalizations of white folks, a taste of how it feels to be a marginalized person. But without understanding the context and history of this country, where white folks have always been in power, will continue to be in power for the foreseeable future!
But I think that this is how the far right, the base of the far right, gets stoked by thinking that like, oh, my gosh, we’re getting picked on, and we’re being marginalized. When in fact, this one single novel cannot marginalize white people. And the minute that they feel quote-unquote “threatened,” they actually do perform this type of thing where it’s showing their dominance by enacting something that is a real threat, like a real threat of physical violence. I think it’s just so sad to think that on a college campus like this, where theoretically students are learning to be better or learning to be better, not just people, but better thinkers, to have more nuanced ideas than, oh, my gosh, your book said something bad or weird about my people, and now I feel really upset! I’m gonna take my toy back and destroy it so that neither of us can have it. It’s just such bizarre, childish thinking that actually goes to show how much more farther these freshman students have to go in their own education.
DAHLIA: I think what we’re seeing here is students who were fully unwilling to engage really with the material that they were reading, which was again, a novel and not a textbook. We, a few weeks back, had an episode of Backtalk about how textbooks are actually often written in a very racist way. And obviously, this is a group of students here at this university who should be reading these texts, who need these texts, because they’re so unwilling to confront the realities of lives unlike their own or just at the basic minimum, so unwilling and unable to confront the fact of privilege, which is not an insult! You know, so many people have seemed to have been trained by pundits rather than by actually engaging with ideas to the fact that privilege is, the idea of privilege is, an insult, or the idea of privilege negates personal experience. Rather than just accepting the idea of privilege. You know, privilege is real and isn’t an insult to you if you have it. It’s just something you have! And you should know about it and learn about it.
And think both of us, Amy, you and I are having trouble sort of wrapping our minds around this intense stubbornness and reluctance, unwillingness to look outside of their own experiences that these students have. And how frustrating it is that obviously, this is a book that could have helped them and opened their eyes if they were so resistant to the ideas in it. If they had only engaged and listened and had open hearts and minds, then probably they would’ve learned something. But obviously, they had a closed mind from the beginning and thought it was, you know, like freshmen or teenagers, they thought it was funny or whatever to harass and intimidate someone who wrote a novel that they didn’t like.
AMY: And then I think it actually does show how incredibly ignorant that they are. Instead of, I don’t know, penning an op ed to their student paper or something, they burned her fucking book, you know! Without thinking about the context of what burning a book has symbolized in our fucking history?
DAHLIA: I know.
AMY: [Laughs.] It’s like it’s mind-bogglingly obvious how fucking idiotic they are or ignorant they are by this is how they enact their frustration. And I think that the only way to correct all of this is that all of us go out and buy a Jennine Capó Crucet book.
AMY: Go to your libraries; requests her books to be on the shelves. This is how we course correct this horrible thing that happened to this writer. She, she’s, she’s a novelist. She writes essays. She’s not out there enacting these policies that push white people to the margins or significantly harm white people. I think that they need to think about their feelings and why they decided to perform their feelings in this way. And that in order to support a writer like this, we need to get her books and make sure that people are reading her work. Because I think if it’s charged enough to make these white students this way, she must be saying some really great things, [laughing] honestly.
[cutesy bells ring]
So, each episode, we wrap it up by letting you guys know a recommendation for a read, watch, and listen. Dahlia, what are you reading!?
I finally got my hands on this book that I thought I had lost to time and history. This book is called Molly Fox’s Birthday
by Deirdre Madden. And I remember so vividly reading it the summer after I graduated from college. And I was living at my mom’
s house, and I was very sad and lonely.
DAHLIA: And I loved this novel and then just immediately forgot everything about it except for the basic plot, which is that I remembered that it took place in one day and that it was set in Ireland, and it had an unnamed narrator. And that was all I could remember about the book!
DAHLIA: And it took me until, so that was, so, it took me like 10 years to find out, figure out what that book was, and it’s Molly Fox’s Birthday by Deirdre Madden. So, Molly Fox’s Birthday is about an unnamed narrator who is a playwright, and she is staying at Molly Fox’s, her good friend’s, house. Molly Fox is an actress. And the narrator reflects on her work writing a new play and her work with Molly as a playwright in the past. And it’s just like a lovely book. And a review on the cover calls it “apparently effortless.” And that’s something that I really, I felt like I connected with. It’s just like, you know, it seems like what a feat to write a book that takes place in one day, mostly just the narrator’s thoughts and not a lot of action. So hard to do in a good way. And this book just seems like the reviewer says, effortless. It just really engages you and keeps you interested, even though it is mostly no action and just someone reflecting on her life with her friends.
I think another thing I really like about it is I like books about artists of other kinds, like artists who aren’t writers. So, I like books about painters or actors especially. So, I just love it. It was real, it’s so good. And…losing Molly Fox’s Birthday was the reason why I started writing down every book, the title of every book I read because I was like, I can’t have this happen again! It took me 10 years to find it again.
DAHLIA: So, I hope you like it.
AMY: But didn’t it feel good to find it and realize that that was the book?
DAHLIA: And the cover, when I saw the cover again, I was like, yes!!! That’s it!
DAHLIA: I was so happy.
AMY: That’s such a good, amazing feeling. I’ve had that with films or songs where I’m like, I’ll go on social media and be like, okay, I need help remembering what this is. And I’ll describe it in this really [laughing] abstract, weird way.
AMY: And then maybe within, by the end of the day, somebody will be like, “Is it this?” And I’m like, “Oh my god! That’s exactly that. Thank you for naming it.” And I think actually, your very specific example kind of speaks to this larger feeling of when you first learn the name of something, be it like a feeling or a type of situation, and it just gives like so much power, and it just feels so fucking good. So, I am celebrating your joy in finding this book. [Laughs.]
DAHLIA: Thank you! [Laughs.]
AMY: So, my watch pick is the film Doubt from 2008. I actually had to go and search through the Backtalk archives to make sure I had it recommended this already. And I don’t think I have in my little search, so I can’t believe I haven’t recommended it already. It’s an amazing film. The plot of it is that it stars Meryl Streep as the sister and principal of this Catholic school where there’s a new priest in town who is the one and only Philip Seymour Hoffman. And Meryl Streep’s character kind of has these, I don’t know, these prickly feelings about Philip Seymour Hoffman, who portrays his character as a very jovial, a kind man. But Meryl Streep’s character kind of has suspicions that perhaps he’s taking or has too particular of interest in male students and specifically this one student who’s a Black student in a very white, I think maybe even almost completely white, school. And Amy Adams plays a very naïve and young sister who teaches the Black student and kind of helps Meryl to affirm her suspicion. And then there’s like this amazing, amazing cameo that Viola Davis does, where she plays the student’s mom and her feelings towards the situation.
But I actually think that, like, ’cause I just re-watched the film, re-watching Doubt in the time of #MeToo is so incredible, I think that especially because this film is set in like the ’60s in the Bronx. So, the time and place and culture are so different. When we talk about systemic abuse, sexual abuse of young people who are really vulnerable and watching this and watching the subtlety and the nuances in the performance and how it speaks to the larger cultural moment of what it meant for the Catholic Church to cover up abuses like this. It’s just so incredible.
And it’s actually a very low-key film that just looks like a slow burn. But it’s just so amazing. And it’s not surprising that it’s actually based on a stage play because of the way the story is plotted. But it’s just like it’s just so perfect! And a lot of it owes to the amazing performances. Every performance, every actor on this is just pitch perfect, and it’s just so great to watch. [Laughs.] I can’t, I cannot over-recommend Doubt. Please watch it. It’s actually streaming on Netflix. That’s how I rewatched it. So, please check it out.
s super interesting to think about re-watching it post #MeToo
s from 2008. And I remember seeing it in theaters, and it’
s one of those movies that’
s very clearly based on a play just because it demands so much intensity from the actors. It’
s mostly like just two-person scenes of people speaking very intensely to each other. Yeah, I think about the last line of Doubt
all the time, actually.
AMY: Mm. Oh my god!!! Meryl
DAHLIA: All the time.
AMY: Ahhhhhhhhhh! [Laughs.]
DAHLIA: I’ll rewatch it.
AMY: Yeah. It’s like it’s breathtaking. It’s so breathtaking. It’s so good. I just cannot over-recommend it, yes.
DAHLIA: Oh man.
AMY: Dahlia, what is your listen recommendation?
Okay. Okay. I have been so obsessed with this song lately. I think I have before recommended the musician Rosalía. She is a Catalonian flamenco/hip hop musician. She is just so incredible. She’
s the subject of a New York Times magazine profile
, I think last week, that’
s excellent that talks about her training as a flamenco musician and her work creating an urban flamenco genre for herself. The song I wanna recommend is “Aute Cuture” by Rosalía. So good! I really recommend the New York Times
magazine profile if you wanna learn a little bit more about her youth and her musical training. But it’
s just incredible. It’
s like her music, when you learn even a little bit more about its roots and the training that goes into it, it just sounds so incredible. I love her music so much, and I love this song so much. And so, please spend all your time listening to Rosalía and the song “Aute Cuture.
[“Aute Cuture” by Rosalía plays]
♪ “Te conjuro y te dejo prenda’o/
Encima del stage yo olvido lo’ peca’o (Sí)/
Y que to’ lo’ santo’ tienen su pasa’o (Chao)/
Yo te bendigo si te tengo al la’o (Amén)/
Su nombre en el cora’ ya no está clava’o (Nah)/
Mano’ en el aire si te lo han rasga’o (Uf)/
Que yo lágrima’ solté un puña’o Olé yo, ¿y qué?….” ♪
AMY: Thanks for listening.
DAHLIA: Thanks for listening.
♪ “Esto está encendío, na, na, na, na/
Esto está encendío, na, na, na, na/
Esto está encendío, na, na, na, na/
Esto está encendío, na, na, na, na (¡Na, na!)….” ♪
DAHLIA: Thanks for listening to Backtalk. This show is produced by Cher Vincent. Bitch Media is a reader- and listener-supported feminist nonprofit. If you wanna support the show and our work, please head over to BitchMedia.org and donate.