Funny or Die's Women's Health “Experts” Video: Hilarious Yet Depressingly Accurate

It’s a shitty time to have a uterus, especially if you don’t want the government telling you what to do with it. Since we’d rather laugh than cry, check out this spot-on video from the folks at Funny or Die, featuring eight middle-aged men giving their “expert” opinions on women’s reproductive health.

Transcript available here!

How sad is it that some of the more outrageous lines in here are real quotes from Republican presidential candidates? It doesn’t make the sentiments about women’s health and putting aspirin between our knees (still confusing, by the way) any less terrifying/terrible, but at least this bullshit goes down easier when Nick Offerman and Tim Meadows say it. Maybe we can get these guys to read transcripts of all of the Republican debates?

by Kelsey Wallace
View profile »

Kelsey Wallace is an editor in Portland, Oregon. Follow her on Twitter if you like TV and pictures of dogs.

Get Bitch Media's top 9 reads of the week delivered to your inbox every Saturday morning! Sign up for the Weekly Reader:

18 Comments Have Been Posted

We need to speak with purpose not sarcasm!

I appreciate these men for standing up for women's reproductive rights and demonstrating the ignorant chauvinism of the "expert panel." However, I feel like this video is counterproductive to the plight of women. If we want to promote women's reproductive rights, we should be doing just that. We should not be mocking the opposition. When we do that, we perpetuate the stereotypes the "expert panel" espouses. When someone tells a racist joke with the intent of demonstrating the absurdity of the racist situation, that person is still presenting that racist philosophy with some degree of truth. Basically, we should not be making light of serious issues. We need to speak with purpose not sarcasm.

Re: We need to speak with purpose not sarcasm!

I disagree - as do people who study these tactics for a living

Fantastic blog post. The post

can't have it both ways

Very funny video. A few points. . .

1. Agree. This sarcastic attack (also Amy Poehler's SNL skit from last week) is too easy. Nobody seems to be asking WHY these men are saying these things or WHAT the world will be like when women lose control of their family planning options. I'd love to see an hilarious mocumentary about a world without birth control (that doesn't just rely on that tired old trope about overpopulation), or a fake news report about increases in the sale of vibrators amongst Catholic health care workers (are you reading this, Onion?).

2. We can't keep asking our men to be more educated about our bodies and to play integral roles in family planning and disease control in one breath (ok, that was maybe two breaths) and then say they can't talk about birth control because they are men in the next breath.

3. I miss Corey Stoll's mustache.

4. Did I actually ever think Judd Nelson was hot?

yes, we can (pardon the pun)

I don't know that anyone is

To me, this was hilarious

To me, this was hilarious (and I felt better after a good laugh) and part of a good start. I think any serious issue asks us to bring a diversity of tactics to address it, and this one - and humour in general - I think can help. It doesn't go all the way, but probably no single intervention could or should.

Thinking that having a uterus

Thinking that having a uterus makes you more knowledgeable about reproductive health is like thinking that being a marathon runner makes you an expert in physiatry. It would seem, by this logic, that we ought to find the woman who has had the most children and ask her opinion. If that sounds absurd, good.

You know, that makes a lot of

You know, that makes a lot of sense. It's a shame there are no female medical practitioners, such as gynecologists or OB/GYNs in the U.S. who could be called upon to weigh in on this matter. Let's face it ladies, we just don't have anyone trained in reproductive health who also happens to have a uterus to speak up on our behalf.

Nice derailing attempt

You seem to be ignoring the fact that none of those legislators or the religious leaders at the congressional hearing had any medical background either.

That's the whole point of this, really. People who have no background in medicine shouldn't be deciding what medical procedures patients - regardless of sex - can decide to do with their doctors.

But good job completely missing the point! Sounds like that logic textbook was a sound investment.

And now you're ignoring the

And now you're ignoring the fact that the purpose of that particular hearing was to determine whether religious organizations would have to provide contraception as part of their health insurance packages, not whether a woman had the right to acquire contraception.There's no reason why one would need to be a medical expert to say, "My religious beleifs prohibit me from aiding a person in using contraception such as the morning-after pill."

Original commenter here

And you're ignoring the fact that the entire hearing was the anti-birth control movement in miniature, which is what this video is lampooning. These cismen, who will never risk becoming pregnant and who do not suffer from various ailments such as PCOS which require hormonal birth control to regulate the symptoms are being called to testify about what they consider appropriate medical care to be for women.

That's what this is about, at the end of the day, that's what these so-called conscience objectors are really talking about, they want the right to control women's health care and their bodies based on their own moral biases and they feel they can do that because they have never and will never have to worry about taking birth control to prevent an unwanted pregnancy or for other reasons of health. The fact that women, or, to be fair, individuals who have uteruses, were not being included in this debate is a huge problem because we're the ones this legislation is going to have the most impact on.

Do you honestly not see the problem with this entire debate?

And if I understand correctly

And if I understand correctly a large part of the debate hinges on whether or not birth control (particularly hormonal contraceptive) is not a part of preventive care. That is a question to be answered by health care professionals (It has been. It is.). Politicians and religious experts shouldn't be able to decide that something they disapprove of is not preventive care.

This gives me an idea...

That line about women who "get angry about us making all these decisions" just being on their periods gave me an idea.

As a woman who takes the pill in order to ease cramps and PMS symptoms, I personally volunteer to go off the pill and spend the week (actually it could be 8 days without the pill) of my period with any politician who has a problem with oral contraception.

If they're still alive at the end of the week*, I suspect they'd happily give me my pills.

OK. Maybe not, but I'd still be willing to try.

*This is meant as a joke. I wouldn't kill/hurt anyone.

Thats funny, I literally

Thats funny, I literally ripped my Sears book to shreds with my bare hands one night when my first child was a few months old, due to the guilt and frustration it caused me. He is completely anti-feminist and the "Baby Book" is the worst baby shower gift I ever recieved. Wouldn't give it to my worst enemy. Good for your husband for throwing them away for you! <a href="">teethwhitening</a>

Add new comment