Students Successfully Get Columbia University to Divest $10 Million from Private Prisons

Columbia University students protesting the school’s investment with private prison companies. Photo by Jo Chiang. 

Today, Columbia became the first university in the United States to divest from private prison companies. Since early 2014, students have been campaigning to get the university to sell off its roughly $10 million worth of shares in two companies that run prisons and immigration detention centers. 

Prisons are “fundamentally racist,” said student organizer Dunni Oduyemi in a statement after the vote by the school’s Board of Trustees to divest from G4S, the world’s largest private security firm, and Corrections Corporation of America, the largest private prison company in the United States. “We hope that private prison divestment campaigns, with the abolitionist vision of a larger anti­prison movement, can help us start working towards divesting from the idea that prisons equal justice.”

For-profit prison companies are a huge lobby in the United States and they lean on political candidates to support new prison construction and privatizion of existing prisons. According to the ACLU, that lobbying is paying off: The number of people in private prisons increased by approximately 1600 percent between 1990 and 2009. There are now about 130 privately run prisons in the country and nearly half of all immigrants who are detained are held in privately run facilities. While private prison companies say they can help governments cut costs, private prisons have been the sites of numerous cases of violence and exceptionally bad conditions. They also often don’t wind up saving governments money at all, in part because some companies have struck deals with states that guarantee maintaining certain prison occupancy rates even if crime goes down. 

A banner on campus calling attention to the school’s investments. Photo courtest Columbia Prison Divest.

In 2013, Columbia students first learned that the university had more than $10 million of its endowment invested in shares of the  two private prison companies. In February 2014, a group of students formed the Columbia Prison Divest campaign and delivered a letter to the school president demanding that the school divest. Over the next year and a half, the students organized protests on campus and gained support from the school’s Advisory Committee on Socially Responsible Investing to divest from the companies.

After today’s vote, a Columbia spokesperson emailed out a statement that says the school will never again invest money from its $9 billion endowment with private prison companies. “This action occurs within the larger, ongoing discussion of the issue of mass incarceration that concerns citizens from across the ideological spectrum,” the statement said.

It’s often hard to get political support for reducing prison populations and closing prisons because politicians want to appear “tough on crime”—and because millions of incarcerated and formerly incarcerated people can’t vote. But the work of groups like these Columbia students helps to make support for prisons politically unsavory. Let’s hope this spreads. 

Related Reading: How Many Women Are in Prison For Defending Themselves Against Domestic Violence? 

Sarah Mirk is Bitch Media’s online editor. 

by Sarah Mirk
View profile »

Sarah Mirk is the former host of Bitch Media’s podcast Popaganda. She’s interested in gender, history, comics, and talking to strangers. You can follow her on Twitter

Get Bitch Media's top 9 reads of the week delivered to your inbox every Saturday morning! Sign up for the Weekly Reader:

1 Comment Has Been Posted

We are living in boom times

We are living in boom times for the private prison industry. The Corrections Corporation of America (CCA), the nation's largest owner of private prisons, has seen its revenue climb by more than 500 percent in the last two decades. And CCA wants to get much, much bigger: Last year, the company made an offer to 48 governors to buy and operate their state-funded prisons. But what made CCA's pitch to those governors so audacious and shocking was that it included a so-called occupancy requirement, a clause demanding the state keep those newly privatized prisons at least 90 percent full at all times, regardless of whether crime was rising or falling

NO prisons should be "For-Profit" Corporate institutions. Don't care what the arguments are, about how "Privatizing is Better", blah blah woof woof - it is a wide-open doorway to EVIL - to corruption, abuse, and morally bankrupt treatment of human beings, IN THE NAME OF PROFIT

Add new comment