We're All Mad Here: Joanna is Mad! Isn't it Romantic?

Anna Pearce
View profile »

Women whom history has deemed as “mad” play an interesting role in pop culture. Some of them are viewed as romantic figures, their stories revered and retold as tragic love. Others are viewed as passive objects, mostly used as props in men’s stories. Still others are retroactively diagnosed as “mad” due to their actions, even when men who did the same or similar things were not.

A lot of these ideas about historical mad women are embodied in the story of Juana of Castile (in English, Joanna), often known as Juana la Loca, or Joanna the Mad. She’s been the subject of paintings, plays, operas, songs, books, and movies, almost always depicted as the mad woman whose obsessive love for her unfaithful husband led to her imprisonment, for the good of Spain. Sometimes she’s accused of necrophilia, other times she’s distantly diagnosed as having schizophrenia, with evidence provided by accounts written by people paid by her husband, father, and son to ensure that she was viewed incompetent to rule. She is rarely presented as having any agency of her own, and in an age where Henry VIII was having wives beheaded for perceived and actual infidelity, Joanna’s “hysterical” jealousy of her husband’s well known affairs has been consistently presented as “proof” of her insanity.

Transcript & Description of Mad Love trailer

Joanna was the third child of Isabella and Ferdinand of “funding the voyages of Columbus” fame. At 16 she was sent off in a marriage of state to the Duke of Burgundy, Philip the Handsome. Joanna fell madly and devastatingly in love with her husband, and his subsequent infidelities are said to have “driven her” into her madness, which was later used by her father, husband, and son to justify locking her up for decades and denying her the crown she inherited from her mother. She was kept captive in Tordesillas from 1509 until her death in 1555, still stylized as “her majesty” with her various male relatives merely ruling in her name. Academics Maria Asuncion Gomez, Santiago Juan-Navarro, and Phyllis Zatlin describe her time there as enduring “almost a half-century of loneliness and well-documented physical and psychological abuse.” (Juana of Castile: history and myth of the mad queen, Introduction, pg 9)

The commonly-held view, especially depicted in pop cultural representations of Joanna, is that she went mad with jealousy. She loved her husband far more than he loved her, and his infidelities are what drove her to a madness that could only be contained by locking her away for most of her life. This appears to be the tact taken by the 2001 movie (released in the US in 2002) Juana la Loca (Mad Love in the US). (Unfortunately I wasn’t able to find a version subtitled in English, so I am relying on the wikipedia description of the film.)

Historians are of mixed opinions as to Joanna’s mental health condition, and whether it was permanent or temporary. There was a history of women with mental health conditions in her family—her maternal grandmother, Isabella of Portugal, had also been confined due to “sinking into melancholia” after the births of her children and then the death of her husband. On the other hand, this history—combined with Joanna’s eratic behavior—allowed her husband to spread rumors that painted her as behaving far worse than she actually did. (Crazy women! You can believe anything about them!)

Part of the romantic legend that has grown up around Joanna is that, upon the death of her husband, she had his body disinterred and carried—at night, accompanied by the entire Royal Entourage, by torchlight—to the place where he had expressed an interest in being buried. According to Uppity Women of Medieval Times, by Vicki Léon, “When (Philip the Handsome) died unexpectedly at twenty-eight, Juana came completely unglued. To get her mind off the tragedy, she toured Spain for three years. The snag was, she dragged Phil’s embalmed corpse along with her—and then found she couldn’t get him out of her mind or her nose.” (pg 106) Other popular histories also emphasize this event, further embellishing the tale.

And… that’s where these stories stop. Joanna married a beautiful man, she fell in love with him, that love drove her crazy, and she was obsessed with his corpse throughout the next fifty years of her life. Léon goes so far as to describe her captivity as being “surrounded… with a variety of musicians and singers.” So romantic! So tragic! So pathetic! Quick, let’s make a movie or write an opera or a novel about that.

We certainly shouldn’t tell the story about how Joanna’s captivity actually went. According to History and Myth of the Mad Queen (pg 14):

Juana lived for forty-seven years locked away in interior chambers without access to natural light. Her jailors were permitted to “give her the strap,” which meant perhaps the authority to tie her up or to whip and torture her, and to “use force.” The queen died in 1555, paralyzed from the waist down, her legs covered in ulcers and tormented by the agony of gangrene.

How romantic.

The pop cultural perceptions of Joanna show many of the same things we’ve seen again and again in this series. Some of this is, of course, based on the historic record. We don’t know if Joanna’s madness was real, a political lie told by every male in her immediate family, or brought about by being a well-educated and well-trained woman in a world where both things were seen as very threatening. However, some of the stories around her emphasis her (alleged?) violent reactions to her husband’s lovers, because crazy women are all violent. They don’t talk explicitly about the abuse that Joanna experienced at the hands of her “caretakers,” since the history of abuse in asylums is one that makes people uncomfortable, and thus isn’t often considered appropriate to the story. The image of her being required to be locked up, for the good of her family, is echoed in modern depictions of “mad” mothers who must also be locked away and thus made passive or, more often, just ending their story. And, of course, so much of this interest in Joanna’s madness, especially focusing on her love life, has a similar feeling to modern fascination with the “madness” of celebrity women.

Previously: We’re All Mad Here: Parenting While Crazy, We’re All Mad Here: Case Studies in Crazy Cartoon Characters

Further Reading:

Get Bitch Media's top 9 reads of the week delivered to your inbox every Saturday morning! Sign up for the Weekly Reader:

6 Comments Have Been Posted

This is really interesting to

This is really interesting to read a learn about - I just got back from Spain and saw the castle that belonged to Joanna (an dheard the story). Also I saw Pradillo's Joanna painting in the Prado. It's an amazing, perfect painting and I'll admit her story did capture me while I was there.


That sounds really awesome! I really love the artwork people have done about her, although, as I say, it's part of the greater story of how she's presented.

I found the book I quoted from about Joanna really interesting. If you're curious about her story, I'd really recommend it.

Mad Love

I remember really enjoying that movie. Well, maybe 'enjoy' isn't the right word. I found it thought-provoking and well-done. I should probably re-watch it to see if my opinion changes, but I remember it being sad and tragic not because her "madness" (I didn't really see anything clinical about her mounting desperation to maintain any kind of power over her life) or her imprisonment was romantic, or romanticized, but because of the abuse, manipulation, and trauma she suffered at the hands of her husband, father, son, and other (male) 'keepers'.

Mad Love

<p>I really wished I'd been able to see it, because it certainly looks interesting and well developed. I'd love to read more about it, if you have the time. I'm hoping my university library might have a subtitled copy.</p>

I saw it in Spain when it

I saw it in Spain when it first came out in theaters, but I see that Netflix has it to mail out in DVD form!

Are there other queens who

Are there other queens who have been perceived as mad? In England there was Mary, still portrayed as wilfully stupid and pitifully obsessed with her husband and her attempts to bear children for him (if I remember rightly - been a while since I read about her).

Actually my first reaction when I read about Juana here was wondering how Mary, Queen of Scots, escaped being labelled as mad. She was also locked up for a considerable time, she had made love matches in the past, she had been sidelined from one royal dynasty and shipped 'home' to another, in a country with forces hostile to her. If Elizabeth, and Mary's enemies in the Scottish court had declared her mad it wouldn't have been so surprising, would it? I wonder why they didn't. Had she shown too much agency already to be considered mad?

Add new comment